Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
217 Adelaide St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64829, -79.38735
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Tory | Councillor staff | 6 | 0 | 11 April 2019 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 4 | 4 | 14 October 2015 |
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 19 March 2019 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM27798 | 217 Adelaide Holdings Limited | 217 Adelaide Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 6 March 2019 – 25 September 2020 | 1 |
| SM27799 | 217 Adelaide Holdings Limited | 217 Adelaide Street West. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 6 March 2019 – 25 April 2019 | 6 |
| SM22331 | Humbold Properties | 217 Adelaide Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 13 October 2015 – 13 October 2019 | 1 |
| SM21699 | Humbold Properties | 217 Adelaide St. W. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 20 April 2015 – 21 October 2019 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 3 February 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 111990 STE 10 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 19 June 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 177189 STE 20 OZOMB Approved · Approved
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 111990 STE 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 3 February 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 15 177189 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 19 June 2015 | OMB Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
217 Adelaide St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 177189 STE 20 OZ · submitted 19 June 2015 · OMB Approved · from registration SM21699 (Humbold Properties)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21699: Applications in support of rezoning for the property at 217 Adelaide St. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 177189 STE 20 OZ at 217 Adelaide St W: This is a substantially amended Zoning Amendment application submitted to address City concerns regardng the previous proposal for a 56-storey residential building. The application has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB). The revised proposal is for a 23-storey commerical building wi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications in support of rezoning for the property at 217 Adelaide St. W.
Matched fields
- address
- 217 ADELAIDE ST W
- application_address
- 217 ADELAIDE ST W
217 Adelaide St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
15 177189 STE 20 OZ · submitted 19 June 2015 · OMB Approved · from registration SM22331 (Humbold Properties)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22331: 217 Adelaide Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 177189 STE 20 OZ at 217 Adelaide St W: This is a substantially amended Zoning Amendment application submitted to address City concerns regardng the previous proposal for a 56-storey residential building. The application has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB). The revised proposal is for a 23-storey commerical building wi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 217 Adelaide Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 217 ADELAIDE ST W
- application_address
- 217 ADELAIDE ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.