Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow

2 St Clair Ave W

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 2; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 0
Applications at this address: 6; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Location: 43.68824, -79.39464
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Astral Media Outdoor, L.P.SM12187 · 29 August 20080
Astral Media Outdoor, L.P.SM12151 · 21 August 20080

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

All registrations· 2 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM12187	Astral Media Outdoor, L.P.	2 St. Clair Avenue West	Signs	29 August 2008 – 31 December 2008	0
SM12151	Astral Media Outdoor, L.P.	2 St. Clair Avenue West	Signs	21 August 2008 – 31 August 2010	0

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 1 October 2026Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5929583In Process · In progress
Submitted 17 October 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0783/25TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 23 October 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0081/20TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 12 March 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0027/20TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 15 January 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0061/18TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 27 July 2017Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0077/17TEYClosed · Approved

Data table· 6 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
COA-5929583 Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	1 October 2026	In Process In progress
A0783/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	17 October 2025	Closed Approved
B0081/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	23 October 2020	Closed Approved
B0027/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	12 March 2020	Closed Approved
A0061/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	15 January 2018	Closed Approved
B0077/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	27 July 2017	Closed Approved

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 2 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 12

20 lobbied · 357 matched

Median days

Lobbied106
Matched, unlobbied145

Approval rate

Lobbied50% n=12
Matched, unlobbied90% n=291

Refusal rate

Lobbied50%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

Lobbied35%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

Lobbied86%
Matched, unlobbied30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 12: 20 lobbied and 357 matched unlobbied applications in 7 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	20	106	50% (n=12)	50%	35%	86%
Matched, unlobbied	357	145	90% (n=291)	10%	5%	30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.