Address · Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
1650 Sheppard Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
- Location
- 43.77511, -79.34908
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 7 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toronto Water | City staff | 9 | 0 | 21 November 2024 |
| Office of Councillor Carroll, Ward 33 | Councillor staff | 6 | 1 | 30 May 2017 |
| Development Review | City staff | 2 | 0 | 15 November 2024 |
| Office of Councillor Carroll, Ward 17 | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 5 December 2019 |
| Ward 33 Don Valley East | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 27 February 2017 |
| Office of Councillor Caroll, Ward 17 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 21 November 2019 |
| Shelley Carroll | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 5 November 2024 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM36067 | 2076204 Ontario Limited | 1650 Sheppard Avenue East | Planning and Development; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 24 October 2024 – 1 January 2025 | 1 |
| SM36061 | 2076204 Ontario Limited | 1650 Sheppard Avenue East | Planning and Development; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 23 October 2024 – 23 October 2026 | 11 |
| SM29187 | 2076204 Ontario Limited | 1650 Sheppard Avenue East. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 21 November 2019 – 25 November 2026 | 3 |
| SM24108 | 2076204 Ontario Limited | 1650 Sheppard Ave. E. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 24 February 2017 – 25 August 2022 | 1 |
| SM24038 | 2076204 Ontario Limited | 1650 Sheppard Avenue East. | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 13 February 2017 – 30 April 2024 | 7 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 12 September 2021Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 21 211396 NNY 17 SBUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 23 December 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 270525 NNY 33 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 211396 NNY 17 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 12 September 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 16 270525 NNY 33 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1650 Sheppard Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 270525 NNY 33 OZ · submitted 23 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM24108 (2076204 Ontario Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24108: OPA & ZBA applications in support of redevelopment of 1650 Sheppard Ave. E. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 270525 NNY 33 OZ at 1650 Sheppard Ave E: Revised: The applicant proposes a 31 storey residential building containing 319 units and three levels of underground parking as well as a three storey block of 12 stacked back-to-back townhouses. The existing 15-storey apartment building containing 149 rental units will be retained. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: OPA & ZBA applications in support of redevelopment of 1650 Sheppard Ave. E.
Matched fields
- address
- 1650 SHEPPARD AVE E
- application_address
- 1650 SHEPPARD AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 17
2 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.