149 Elder St

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 0
Communications on those registrations: 0
Applications at this address: 3; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 6 · James Pasternak
Location: 43.76290, -79.45409
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

None.

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 20 March 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 124768 NNY 06 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 18 June 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 173835 NNY 06 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 7 July 2010Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 10 214567 NNY 10 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 3 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
23 124768 NNY 06 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	20 March 2023	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
19 173835 NNY 06 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	18 June 2019	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
10 214567 NNY 10 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	7 July 2010	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

147 Elder St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 173835 NNY 06 SA · submitted 18 June 2019 · Closed · from registration SM28631 (Cairn Merchant Partners)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28631: A Site Plan Agreement application and a Minor Variance for the site 103 Overbrook Place. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 173835 NNY 06 SA at 147 Elder St: Three storey addition (953 sqm) to the existing nursing home. A total of 7 new parking spaces are proposed in addition to the existing 13 parking spaces at 147-151 Elder St. One type "C" loading space is proposed. The existing dwelling at 103 Overbrook Pl. will be demolished. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: A Site Plan Agreement application and a Minor Variance for the site 103 Overbrook Place.
Matched fields
address
103 OVERBROOK PL
application_address
103 OVERBROOK PL

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6

17 lobbied · 41 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6: 17 lobbied and 41 matched unlobbied applications in 12 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	17	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	41	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.