Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow

14 Rosemary Lane

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 3; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 5; 5 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 2; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Location: 43.70010, -79.42350
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Bram GranovskySM33749 · 26 September 20223
Bram GranovskySM33745 · 26 September 20221
Bram GranovskySM33750 · 26 September 20221

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Mayor Tory1
Office of Mayor John Tory1
Ward 22 Scarborough-Agincourt1
Ward 3 Etobicoke-Lakeshore1
Ward 9 Davenport1

Data table· 5 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Last contact
Mayor Tory	Councillor staff	1	28 September 2022
Office of Mayor John Tory	Councillor staff	1	27 September 2022
Ward 22 Scarborough-Agincourt	Member of council	1	27 September 2022
Ward 3 Etobicoke-Lakeshore	Member of council	1	27 September 2022
Ward 9 Davenport	Member of council	1	27 September 2022

All registrations· 3 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM33745	Bram Granovsky	14 Rosemary Lane.	Planning and Development; Heritage	26 September 2022 – 31 December 2022	1
SM33749	Bram Granovsky	14 Rosemary Lane	Planning and Development; Heritage	26 September 2022 – 8 July 2024	3
SM33750	Bram Granovsky	14 Rosemary Lane	Planning and Development; Heritage	26 September 2022 – 22 December 2022	1

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 1 February 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0120/24TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 13 November 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1039/20TEYClosed · Refused

Data table· 2 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0120/24TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	1 February 2024	Closed Approved
A1039/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	13 November 2020	Closed Refused

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 12

20 lobbied · 357 matched

Median days

Lobbied106
Matched, unlobbied145

Approval rate

Lobbied50% n=12
Matched, unlobbied90% n=291

Refusal rate

Lobbied50%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

Lobbied35%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

Lobbied86%
Matched, unlobbied30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 12: 20 lobbied and 357 matched unlobbied applications in 7 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	20	106	50% (n=12)	50%	35%	86%
Matched, unlobbied	357	145	90% (n=291)	10%	5%	30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.