125 George Henry Blvd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 11; 11 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 7; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
Location: 43.77345, -79.34559
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

ELAD Canada Operations IncSM20146 · 5 March 201411

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 10 York Centre1
Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence1
Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence1
Ward 23 Willowdale1
Ward 24 Willowdale1
Ward 25 Don Valley West1
Ward 26 Don Valley West1
Ward 33 Don Valley East1

Data table· 11 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 10 York Centre	Member of council	1	0	10 August 2014
Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence	Member of council	1	0	10 August 2014
Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence	Member of council	1	0	10 August 2014
Ward 23 Willowdale	Member of council	1	0	10 August 2014
Ward 24 Willowdale	Member of council	1	0	10 August 2014
Ward 25 Don Valley West	Member of council	1	0	10 August 2014
Ward 26 Don Valley West	Member of council	1	0	10 August 2014
Ward 33 Don Valley East	Member of council	1	1	7 August 2014
Ward 34 Don Valley East	Member of council	1	0	10 August 2014
Ward 8 York West	Member of council	1	0	10 August 2014
Ward 9 York Centre	Member of council	1	0	10 August 2014

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM20146	ELAD Canada Operations Inc	125 George Henry Blvd	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	5 March 2014 – 31 December 2014	11

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 2 May 2018Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 18 151979 NNY 33 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 22 December 2016Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 16 270214 NNY 33 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 30 September 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 230503 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 20 August 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 209904 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 24 June 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 179745 NNY 33 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 6 February 2014Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0090/14NYApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
Submitted 22 November 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 269119 NNY 33 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 7 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
18 151979 NNY 33 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	2 May 2018	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
16 270214 NNY 33 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	22 December 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
15 230503 NNY 33 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	30 September 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
15 209904 NNY 33 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	20 August 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
15 179745 NNY 33 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	24 June 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0090/14NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	6 February 2014	Application Withdrawn Withdrawn
13 269119 NNY 33 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	22 November 2013	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 2 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 17

14 lobbied · 20 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 17: 14 lobbied and 20 matched unlobbied applications in 11 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	14	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	20	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17

13 lobbied · 16 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17: 13 lobbied and 16 matched unlobbied applications in 11 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	13	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	16	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 17

2 lobbied · 54 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 17: 2 lobbied and 54 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	54	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.