Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
1226 Bloor St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.65935, -79.43932
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deputy Mayor Ana Bailao | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 25 July 2018 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM26555 | Niki Tsourounakis | 1226 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian… | 25 July 2018 – 25 July 2019 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 12 August 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0052/20TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 10 June 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4766853Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 6 March 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0326/20TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 2 March 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0028/20TEYApplication Withdrawn · Withdrawn
- Submitted 12 January 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0046/18TEYClosed · Approved
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0052/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 12 August 2020 | Closed Approved |
| COA-4766853 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 10 June 2020 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| A0326/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 March 2020 | Closed Approved |
| B0028/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 2 March 2020 | Application Withdrawn Withdrawn |
| A0046/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 12 January 2018 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1226 Bloor St W · Minor variance (MV)
A0046/18TEY · submitted 12 January 2018 · Closed · from registration SM26555 (Niki Tsourounakis)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM26555: 1226 Bloor Street West, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0046/18TEY at 1226 Bloor St W: To construct third and fourth-storey additions above the existing two-storey commercial-residential building and to convert the entire building use to an eating establishment. The building will contain a front third storey patio, a second storey central courtyard patio, and a partially enclosed par… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1226 Bloor Street West, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 1226 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1226 BLOOR ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 9
2 lobbied · 7 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.