lobbyTO

Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik

1 Yonge St

Registrations naming this address
6
4 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
68
8 offices contacted
Applications at this address
17
8 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Location
43.64236, -79.37437
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

6

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Mayor's Office44
  • Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale9
  • Office of Councillor Cressy, Ward 105
  • Councillor Cressy, Ward 104
  • Office of Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 282
  • Office of Councillor Troisi, Ward 282
  • Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 281
  • Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York1
Data table· 8 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Mayor's OfficeCouncillor staff44728 October 2019
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-RosedaleMember of council9912 December 2016
Office of Councillor Cressy, Ward 10Councillor staff5018 June 2020
Councillor Cressy, Ward 10Councillor staff4015 March 2021
Office of Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 28Councillor staff2212 December 2016
Office of Councillor Troisi, Ward 28Councillor staff2020 June 2018
Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 28Councillor staff1113 March 2012
Ward 10 Spadina-Fort YorkMember of council1013 December 2018
All registrations· 6 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM34316Pinnacle International1 Yonge StPlanning and Development27 March 2023 – 31 December 20260
SM18725Mondiale Development LTD.1 Yonge StreetBuilding Permits; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development App…5 December 2012 – 30 November 202657
SM18743Pinnacle Internation Group1 Yonge StreetPlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law3 December 2012 – 3 November 20161
SM18737Pinnacle International1 Yonge StreetPlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law30 November 2012 – 28 October 20182
SM18712Pinnacle International1 Yonge StreetPlanning and Development, Combined Application23 November 2012 – 27 November 20236
SM17882Osmington Inc.1 Yonge StreetPlanning and Development, Planning Policy / Study8 March 2012 – 8 November 20122

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

17
Data table· 17 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
25 258901 STE 10 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)26 November 2025Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
25 239794 STE 10 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)15 October 2025Under Review
In progress
COA-5589014
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)27 February 2025Cancelled
Withdrawn
22 227414 STE 10 CD
Development application
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)8 November 2022Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
22 221549 STE 10 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)25 October 2022Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
22 221560 STE 10 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)25 October 2022Under Review
In progress
22 221636 STE 10 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)25 October 2022OMB Appeal
In progress
22 138373 STE 10 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)26 April 2022Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
21 245354 STE 10 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)6 December 2021Under Review
In progress
A0739/20TEY
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)27 August 2020Closed
Approved
20 152435 STE 10 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)4 June 2020Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
19 234404 STE 10 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)9 October 2019Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
17 108913 STE 28 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)25 January 2017NOAC Issued
Approved
16 269114 STE 28 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)20 December 2016Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
16 126393 STE 28 SB
Development application
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)11 March 2016Amend Drft Plan App
Approved
13 129256 STE 10 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)6 March 2013Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
10 306318 STE 28 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)1 December 2010Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=7
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied10%
  • Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied88—100% (n=7)0%10%0.03
Matched, unlobbied94—100% (n=7)0%5%0.01
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

20 lobbied · 261 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied136
  • Matched, unlobbied138

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=20
  • Matched, unlobbied93% n=214

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied14%
  • Matched, unlobbied18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied126
  • Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

  • Lobbied75% n=154
  • Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied19%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied43%
  • Matched, unlobbied27%
Data table· 4 rows
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10: 20 lobbied and 261 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied20136100% (n=20)0%0%14%
Matched, unlobbied26113893% (n=214)7%5%18%
Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied17312675% (n=154)25%19%43%
Matched, unlobbied3,64611491% (n=3,058)9%4%27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10

4 lobbied · 25 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=3
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%
Data table· 4 rows
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10: 4 lobbied and 25 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied4Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied25Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied28—100% (n=3)0%0%0.04
Matched, unlobbied95—100% (n=6)0%0%0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=5
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied3%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied66—100% (n=5)0%3%0.05
Matched, unlobbied165—100% (n=11)0%2%0.04
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 10

1 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 4 rows
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 10: 1 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied1Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied8Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied16Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied48Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.